A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Percutaneous penile venoablation for treatment of impotence. | LitMetric

Percutaneous penile venoablation for treatment of impotence.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mainz, Federal Republic of Germany.

Published: January 1994

Percutaneous penile venoablation with sclerosing agents and coils was performed in 58 patients. Of 104 ablations attempted, 44 of 51 (86%) transpenile, and 46 of 53 (86.7%) retrograde interventions were technically successful. In 40 patients (69%) erectile function improved (intercourse was possible in 21 without additional measures). Initially improved erectile function deteriorated in 24 patients during follow-up (in an average of 6 months); in 15 of these, intercourse was still possible with injection of vasoactive drugs. In 7 patients, repeat venoablation improved erectile function again. Hot contrast medium was slightly superior to sodium morrhuate as a sclerosing agent. In successfully treated patients, the average decrease in venous leakage was 30 ml/min vs 13 ml/min in treatment failures, with considerable overlap between both groups. Only minor complications were observed. We conclude that percutaneous penile venoablation is technically feasible, and safe. Whether the procedure will have a definite role in the treatment of venogenic impotence, however, still has to be determined.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02629158DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

percutaneous penile
12
penile venoablation
12
erectile function
12
improved erectile
8
patients
5
venoablation
4
venoablation treatment
4
treatment impotence
4
impotence percutaneous
4
venoablation sclerosing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!