Nurse executives play a key role in quality management and need a working knowledge of which data collection and improvement tools to use. This knowledge insures effective analysis and decision making necessary to drive department and organizational transformation through quality improvement programs. The author presents the most frequently used tools for quality improvement, with a focus on applications in practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005110-199312000-00008 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Objective: This quality improvement initiative aimed to increase the rate of provider screening and documentation of contraception use for reproductive-aged women seen in an academic rheumatology fellows' clinic to >50% by 24 weeks, with sustained improvement at one year.
Methods: With a multidisciplinary team, we devised and implemented six interventional cycles over 24 weeks informed by key stakeholder survey responses. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of eligible visits with contraception information documented in the structured electronic health record field.
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst - Diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program - Risk model for patients undergoing abdominoplasty after massive weight loss - Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study.
JPRAS Open
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Background: This study aimed to validate the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk calculator for predicting outcomes in patients undergoing abdominoplasty after massive weight loss.
Methods: Patients' characteristics, pre-existing comorbidities and adverse outcomes in our department from 2013 to 2023 were collected retrospectively. Adverse events were defined according to ACS-NSQIP standards and predicted risks were calculated manually using the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator.
Stressors contributing to burnout among acute care and trauma surgery care teams: a systems-analysis approach.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
January 2025
Division of Healthcare Engineering, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Background: Burnout negatively impacts healthcare professionals' well-being, leading to an increased risk of human errors and patient harm. There are limited assessments of burnout and associated stressors among acute care and trauma surgery teams.
Methods: Acute care and trauma surgery team members at a US academic medical center were administered a survey that included a 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory and 21 workplace stressors based on the National Academy of Medicine's systems model of clinician burnout and professional well-being.
Changes in multidisciplinary perceptions of trauma video review following implementation of a novel program: let us go to the tape.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
January 2025
Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Background: Trauma video review (TVR) is an evolving technology that can be used to measure technical and non-technical aspects of trauma care leading to meaningful improvements. Only 30% of centers currently use TVR, with non-users citing medicolegal concerns, staff discomfort with recording, and resource constraints as barriers to implementation. Multiple studies have shown established TVR programs are well-perceived by staff.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRethinking routine: selective postoperative laboratory testing is safe in emergency surgery patients.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
January 2025
Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!