Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Fifteen patients with chronic obstruction of leg arteries (mean length: 6 cm) were treated with the Kensey catheter and then with PTA. In 11 cases the procedure was successful (74%) and in 2 it was interrupted--in one case for dissection and in the other for vessel perforation. Two maneuvers, after dissection, were ended with PTA and stent placement (overall success rate: 87%). Emergency surgery was never needed. In the cases solved with the Kensey catheter, the cumulative patency rate was 51% at 6, 12 and 24 months. The Kensey catheter did not improve the results of conventional PTA, which means its role is complementary to that of PTA and an alternative to more expensive laser systems, if PTA fails.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!