Comparison of a conscious versus anesthetized canine model in response to milrinone, hydralazine and nitroprusside.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate, based on previous and new data, that the differences between a conscious and anesthetized canine model in the cardiovascular responses to cardiovasoactive agents were beyond their difference in the sensitivity of the compensatory mechanisms. In both conscious and anesthetized canine models, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was decreased by hydralazine (at 1-3 mg/kg and 0.3-3 mg/kg; by -26.5 +/- 4.5 and -18.8 +/- 11.7% [max. changes expressed as mean +/- SEM], respectively). MAP was also decreased by nitroprusside (both at 0.01-0.1 mg/kg, by 54.6 +/- 2.8 and -60.5 +/- 3.0%, respectively) in the conscious and anesthetized models. However, the differential MAP responses to hydralazine and nitroprusside between the two models are inconsistent with a difference in the sensitivity of the two models. Hydralazine at 1 mg/kg decreased MAP greater in the conscious than anesthetized model, whereas nitroprusside decreased MAP similarly in the two models. In conclusion, not all differential responses to hydralazine and nitroprusside between conscious and anesthetized canine models can be explained by a difference in the sensitivity of their compensatory mechanisms.