Parkinson's disease patients (PD) do not differ from control subjects (CS) when they have to execute a problem solving task in which external cues for solving the problem are given. However, when PD have to solve a problem by means of an internally generated strategy, they show a serious decrease in performance. We hypothesised that this distinction may also apply to the way PD and CS organize recall. In order to test our hypothesis the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) was administered to 59 PD and 30 CS. The test consists of five learning trials using a 16-word target list, composed of four items from each of four semantic categories. The fact that the word list was built on this implicit organization was not divulged in advance. The sequence in which the words were read is fixed; each subsequent word belongs to a category being different from the category to which the preceding word belongs. The organization in recall according to the semantic categories is considered to be the result of an unprompted, internally generated strategy. Recall according to the sequence in which the words are read by the experimenter, is viewed as an externally offered strategy. The results prove to be in line with our hypothesis: unlike CS who appeared to rely mainly and increasingly on an internally generated semantic organization, PD showed evidence of gradually adhering more to the externally imposed serial sequence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90135-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

internally generated
12
parkinson's disease
8
generated strategy
8
semantic categories
8
sequence read
8
word belongs
8
memory learning
4
learning strategies
4
strategies patients
4
patients parkinson's
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!