The central nervous system contains circuitry that inhibits pain sensitivity (analgesia), as well as circuitry that opposes pain inhibition (anti-analgesia). Activation of analgesia systems and anti-analgesia systems can each be brought under environmental control using classical conditioning procedures. Analgesia can be produced by cues present before and during aversive events such as electric shock, while active inhibition of analgesia comes to be produced by cues never present immediately before or during shock and therefore signal safety. We have recently reported that these analgesia and anti-analgesia systems interact at the level of the spinal cord. A series of 3 experiments were performed to examine how such interactions occur. First, potential opioid mediation of conditioned analgesia was investigated using systemic and intrathecal (i.t.) delivery of opiate antagonists. Conditioned analgesia was found to be mediated by activation of spinal mu and delta opiate receptors. Second, analgesia produced by each of these receptor subtypes was challenged by environmental signals for safety. Analgesias produced by mu and delta opiate agonists were each abolished by safety signals. Third, antagonists/antisera directed against several putative anti-opiate neurotransmitters were tested i.t. to identify which mediate conditioned anti-analgesia at the level of the spinal cord. A cholecystokinin antagonist abolished conditioned anti-analgesia. In contrast, neuropeptide FF antiserum and a kappa opiate antagonist were without effect.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)91924-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conditioned anti-analgesia
12
spinal cord
12
analgesia produced
12
analgesia
8
anti-analgesia systems
8
produced cues
8
level spinal
8
conditioned analgesia
8
delta opiate
8
anti-analgesia
6

Similar Publications

Inhibition of morphine analgesia by LPS: role of opioid and NMDA receptors and spinal glia.

Behav Brain Res

January 2005

School of Psychology, Griffith Taylor Building, A19, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of toxins, such as the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is associated with a well-characterized increase in sensitivity to painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) [Watkins LR, Maier SF, Goehler LE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anti-analgesic and anti-amnesic effect of complement C3a.

Life Sci

September 2000

Research Institute for Food Science, Kyoto University, Uji, Japan.

In the present study, we found that complement C3a exerted central effects after intracerebroventricular administration in mice. At doses of 3 and 10 pmol/mouse, the peptide showed an antagonistic effect on analgesia induced by morphine and U-50488H, known to be mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists, respectively. Moreover, complement C3a improved scopolamine- and ischemia-induced amnesia at a dose of 10 pmol/mouse.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The spinal cord contains endogenous substances (such as cholecystokinin, FMRFamide, etc.) that can block the analgesic effects of opiates. Anti-opiate actions have been most commonly studied by exogenous administration of receptor agonists and receptor antagonists of these substances.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The central nervous system contains circuitry that inhibits pain sensitivity (analgesia), as well as circuitry that opposes pain inhibition (anti-analgesia). Activation of analgesia systems and anti-analgesia systems can each be brought under environmental control using classical conditioning procedures. Analgesia can be produced by cues present before and during aversive events such as electric shock, while active inhibition of analgesia comes to be produced by cues never present immediately before or during shock and therefore signal safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!