A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Motion artifact as a pitfall in diagnosis of meniscal tear on gradient reoriented MRI of the knee. | LitMetric

Motion artifact as a pitfall in diagnosis of meniscal tear on gradient reoriented MRI of the knee.

J Comput Assist Tomogr

Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (Jewish Hospital), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

Published: April 1994

Objective: Reorientation of the phase and frequency encoding gradients is frequently performed for knee MRI to improve visualization of the cruciate ligaments. This technique allows pulsation artifacts arising from the popliteal vessels to be redirected away from the intercondylar notch. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential for this method to result in false-positive depictions of meniscal tears based on subtle patient motion.

Materials And Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee was performed in five patients using gradient reorientation. Repeat examinations were then performed following deliberate instruction to the patients regarding the importance of refraining from moving the extremity.

Results: The MRI performed with gradient reorientation demonstrated apparent meniscal tears using standard criteria. However, the repeat examinations following deliberate patient instructions to refrain from moving demonstrated the affected menisci to be normal in all patients.

Conclusion: Knee motion during image acquisition may result in ghosting artifacts of relatively high signal intensity structures such as marrow within the femoral condyles and hyaline cartilage along the articular surfaces. These artifacts may traverse the menisci on gradient-reoriented images and result in confusion with meniscal tear. Whereas gradient reorientation is a valuable tool for improving depiction of the cruciate ligaments, one must be aware of the potential for this technique to result in simulation of meniscal tears.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199403000-00022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

meniscal tears
12
gradient reorientation
12
meniscal tear
8
tear gradient
8
cruciate ligaments
8
repeat examinations
8
meniscal
5
motion artifact
4
artifact pitfall
4
pitfall diagnosis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!