Fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific composite DNA probes ('chromosome painting') appears to be a useful tool for quantifying symmetrical cytogenetic damage. However, a thorough comparison between chromosome painting and the conventional methods of GTG-banding and dicentric analysis has not been performed. We have undertaken the validation of chromosome painting using human blood exposed in vitro to 137Cs gamma-rays at doses ranging from 0 to 400 cGy, then cultured according to standard procedures and harvested at 52 h. For painting, bound probes were detected either with fluoresceinated avidin and counterstained with propidium iodide, or with ChromoBlue WCP Probe and Giemsa. The first approach utilizes ultraviolet excitation in which painted chromosomes appear yellow and the remaining chromosomes appear red. The ChromoBlue labelling approach requires ordinary light microscopy in which painted chromosomes appear dark blue and the remaining chromosomes appear light blue. With each method, exchanges between painted and unpainted chromosomes appear bi-coloured. Because only a fraction of all possible exchanges are detected, the number of metaphases examined is adjusted according to the fraction of the genome painted. We have performed painting by several methods, including fluorescence with chromosome 4 probe alone, fluorescence with probes for chromosomes 1, 3 and 4 simultaneously, and chromogenic painting with chromosome 4 probe alone. The results obtained by the various painting methods were compared with GTG-banded cells which were examined for both translocations and dicentrics. In addition, unbanded metaphases stained with Giemsa were scored for dicentrics. Our data show that the frequency of chromosome exchanges detected by painting and banding agree with each other and with the number of dicentrics seen in unbanded cells, at least at doses of < or = 200 cGy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09553009314551081 | DOI Listing |
Front Cell Infect Microbiol
January 2025
Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Background: is a significant cause of healthcare-associated infections, with rising antimicrobial resistance complicating treatment. This study offers a genomic analysis of , focusing on sequence types (STs), global distribution, antibiotic resistance genes, and virulence factors in its chromosomal and plasmid DNA.
Methods: A total of 19,711 genomes were retrieved from GenBank.
J Endocr Soc
January 2025
Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
In the last 10 years the field of prenatal diagnosis has been significantly reshaped followed by the implementation of noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing methodologies in clinical practice. Based on a superior performance and higher sensitivity and specificity than the former practice of biochemical markers screening, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommend noninvasive prenatal cfDNA screening for trisomy 21, 18, 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidy to all pregnant people. While cfDNA screening is helpful in risk assessment for the most common autosomal trisomies, cfDNA also provides information about fetal sex chromosomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Food Microbiol
February 2025
MOST-USDA Joint Research Center for Food Safety and NMPA Key Laboratory for Testing Technology of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Department of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture & Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. Electronic address:
Salmonella is an important foodborne pathogen that poses a significant threat to food safety. This study aims to assess the prevalence, genomic features, and colistin-resistant mechanisms of Salmonella isolates collected from 118 retail pork samples from January 2021 to January 2022 in Shanghai, China. Overall, 46 (39.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGene
January 2025
Faculty of Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000 Viet Nam.
Cells preserve and convey certain gene expression patterns to their progeny through the mechanism called epigenetic memory. Epigenetic memory, encoded by epigenetic markers and components, determines germline inheritance, genomic imprinting, and X chromosome inactivation. First discovered long non coding RNAs were implicated in genomic imprinting and X-inactivation and these two phenomena clearly demonstrate the role of lncRNAs in epigenetic memory regulation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Opin Cell Biol
January 2025
Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, 411-8540, Japan; Department of Genetics, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Mishima, 411-8540, Japan. Electronic address:
Faithful chromosome segregation in eukaryotes relies on physical cohesion between newly duplicated sister chromatids. Cohesin is a ring-shaped ATPase assembly that mediates sister chromatid cohesion through its ability to topologically entrap DNA. Cohesin, assisted by several regulatory proteins, binds to DNA prior to DNA replication and then holds two sister DNAs together when it encounters the replication machinery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!