A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Stretch reflexes in human masseter. | LitMetric

Stretch reflexes in human masseter.

J Physiol

Department of Physiology, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Published: April 1994

The reflex response to stretch in most contracting human muscles includes both a short-latency, probably monosynaptic, excitatory component, and a longer-latency, polysynaptic excitation. However, it has been claimed that stretch of the jaw-closing muscles evokes only the short-latency response in masseter. This question was re-examined, using controlled stretches of varied rates and durations. Very brief, rapid stretches analogous to the stimuli used to investigate the 'jaw-jerk' reflex in earlier studies evoked a prominent excitatory peak in the electromyogram at monosynaptic latency excitation, but little or no longer-latency excitation. This response could be produced even by stimuli that were barely detectable by the subject. However, this prominent electrical response did not produce a measurable increase in biting force. In contrast, slower stretches evoked both a short- and a longer-latency excitatory response in the surface electromyogram, as in most limb muscles. It is shown that the absence of a long-latency excitatory response in earlier studies can be explained by the powerful reflex disfacilitation of the motoneurones that occurred at the end of the brief stretches used. Depending on the duration of the stretch, this disfacilitation is often sufficient to mask or abolish the long-latency reflex. The reflex response to stretches was not markedly affected by blocking the activation of mechanoreceptors around the teeth with local anaesthetic, indicating that receptors around the teeth cannot be playing more than a minor role in the response. The stretch-induced increase in force became greater as the velocity of the stretch decreased.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1160444PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020134DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

response
8
reflex response
8
earlier studies
8
excitatory response
8
stretch
5
reflex
5
stretches
5
stretch reflexes
4
reflexes human
4
human masseter
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!