Objective: To evaluate the impact of postoperative therapy (chemotherapy vs. irradiation) on overall survival.
Design: A nationwide retrospective analysis.
Setting: Hanusch-Krankenhaus, Department of Gynaecology,
Subjects: 115 patients with histologically proved primary carcinoma of the Fallopian tube: 49 received six treatment cycles of a cis-platinum regimen (group I), 24 patients were treated by full irradiation using 50 Gray minimum (group II). The two groups had a similar distribution of stage I and II; in the more advanced stages chemotherapy was the predominant method of treatment.
Results: The five-year survival rate was 53% for women receiving irradiation as against 27% for those given cis-platinum. If the analysis was restricted to those patients with comparable stage I and stage II lesions, the p-value (0.07) was of borderline significance. There was no advantage in adding abdominal to pelvic irradiation (P = 0.62).
Conclusions: Stage I and stage II carcinoma is probably better treated postoperatively by radiotherapy than chemotherapy. Chemotherapy may have more therapeutic potential in patients with more advanced lesions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02390670 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!