When extended outdoor scenes are imaged with magnification of 1 in optical, electronic, or computer-generated displays, scene features appear smaller and farther than in direct view. This has been shown to occur in various periscopic and camera-viewfinder displays outdoors in daylight. In four experiments it was found that apparent minification of the size of a planar object at a distance of 3-9 m indoors occurs in the viewfinder display of an SLR camera both in good light and in darkness with only the luminous object visible. The effect is robust and survives changes in the relationship between object luminance in the display and in direct view and occurs in the dark when subjects have no prior knowledge of room dimensions, object size or object distance. The results of a fifth experiment suggest that the effect is an instance of reduced visual size constancy consequent on elimination of cues for size, which include those for distance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p221075 | DOI Listing |
When the origin of magnification-minification of an outline rectangle had a horizontal locus which exceeded one-fourth of the rectangle's horizontal dimension, 16 observers of 21 reported apparent depth characteristic of looming and recession.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerception
April 1995
DSTO Air Operations Division, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Apparent minification of virtual images has been attributed to accommodation micropsia, that is, a reduction in the apparent size of viewed objects accompanying an inward accommodation of the eyes. Thirteen bilateral pseudophakes incapable of accommodation but with good residual vision were tested monocularly for apparent minification in the viewfinder of a single-lens reflex camera. Apparent minification of about the same order as that typically found with normals occurred with the pseudophakic observers, demonstrating that pseudophakes are subject to distortions in apparent size with virtual-imaging displays in the same way as normals, thus establishing that visual accommodation is not a necessary condition for the effect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerception
August 1994
Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria, Carlton South, Australia.
When extended outdoor scenes are imaged with magnification of 1 in optical, electronic, or computer-generated displays, scene features appear smaller and farther than in direct view. This has been shown to occur in various periscopic and camera-viewfinder displays outdoors in daylight. In four experiments it was found that apparent minification of the size of a planar object at a distance of 3-9 m indoors occurs in the viewfinder display of an SLR camera both in good light and in darkness with only the luminous object visible.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHum Factors
June 1992
Department of Optometry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The apparent size of an object is diminished when accommodation of the eye moves inward to a position closer to the observer than to a viewed object. This phenomenon is called accommodation micropsia. Using schematic eyes, we investigated change in retinal image size caused by a change in accommodation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInterocular differences in apparent size (aniseikonia) are typically associated with interocular differences in refractive error (anisometropia). Aniseikonia is generally thought to reflect disparities in retinal image size that often accompany anisometropia. This assumption was examined with seven highly anisometropic subjects who were tested under conditions in which no substantial retinal image size differences were present.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!