AI Article Synopsis

  • The study used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) in liver transplant patients with allograft dysfunction, comparing results with light microscopy and immunohistochemistry.
  • Nested PCR demonstrated a high sensitivity (100%) but lower specificity (42.9%), suggesting it may identify more cases than clinically relevant CMV disease.
  • The control group showed no significant CMV evidence, but some patients tested positive with nested PCR, indicating it might detect latent infections not clinically relevant in symptomatic patients.

Article Abstract

The polymerase chain reaction was used to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) in 91 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded needle biopsies from 38 liver transplant patients with allograft dysfunction. Thirty donor liver biopsies served as negative controls. PCR results were compared with light microscopy (LM), immunohistochemical staining (IH) for CMV early and late antigen, and clinical data. Primers to the major immediate early gene (MIE) and the viral DNA polymerase gene were duplex amplified. PCR product was reamplified with a nested primer set for the MIE and confirmed by electrophoretic mobilities and dot blotting. Primers for human beta-hemoglobin were used as internal controls. Seventeen of 38 patients had clinical evidence of cytomegalovirus disease, 12 of these were IH-positive, 14 were LM-positive, 15 were duplex PCR-positive and 17 were nested PCR-positive. In addition, duplex PCR was positive in one patient without other evidence of CMV disease, while nested PCR was positive in 12 such patients. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of nested PCR was 100%--however, the specificities and positive predictive values were only 42.9 and 58.6%, respectively. The control group was completely negative by LM, IH, and duplex PCR, however, 6 of 30 patients were nested PCR-positive. The number of nested-positive, duplex-negative patients without CMV disease was significantly greater in the transplant group versus the control group (12/21 vs. 6/30, P < 0.009). The incidence of IgG seropositivity was also significantly greater in the transplant group versus the controls (29/32 vs. 15/24, P < 0.02). We conclude that nested PCR may be an overly sensitive technique for the detection of clinically relevant CMV disease. A negative nested PCR assay for CMV may, however, help rule-out symptomatic CMV infection in an individual case. Duplex PCR showed little advantage over LM, while IH was confirmatory but did not add any new information in this study.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nested pcr
20
duplex pcr
16
cmv disease
12
pcr
11
liver transplant
8
light microscopy
8
nested
8
nested pcr-positive
8
pcr positive
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!