Characteristics of an oxidant formed during iron (II) autoxidation.

Free Radic Biol Med

Department of Pharmacology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190.

Published: April 1994

When ethanol (100 mM) and the spin trapping agent DMPO were added to a solution of FeSO4 (0.1 mM) in phosphate buffer (40 mM), pH 7.4, the spectrum of the 1-hydroxyethyl radical spin adduct of DMPO could be detected by ESR spectroscopy. The ESR signal intensity of the 1-hydroxyethyl radical increased with higher concentrations of phosphate. Under these conditions, hydroxyl radical adducts could not be detected. However, if H2O2 (0.1 mM) was also added, the ESR spectra contained signals from both the hydroxyl and 1-hydroxyethyl radical adducts of DMPO. When ethanol was replaced with azide (100 mM) in these experiments, strong ESR signals from the azidyl radical adduct of DMPO were observed only in the Fenton system. The absence of hydroxyl radical adduct signals in the Fe(2+)-PO4 reaction could not be explained by instability of the hydroxyl radical adduct in the presence of Fe2+ or superoxide. Experiments with oxygen radical scavengers indicated that the oxidant formed during Fe2+ autoxidation was less reactive to benzoate, DMSO and tert-butanol than the hydroxyl radical. The available data indicate that the primary oxidant formed during Fe2+ autoxidation in phosphate buffer is not the hydroxyl radical, but may be an iron-oxygen complex such as a ferryl species.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)90126-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hydroxyl radical
20
oxidant formed
12
1-hydroxyethyl radical
12
radical adduct
12
radical
10
phosphate buffer
8
adduct dmpo
8
radical adducts
8
formed fe2+
8
fe2+ autoxidation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!