A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the prophylactic effect of intravesical installation of Adriamycin (ADM) plus verapamil (VR) with that of ADM alone for recurrence of superficial bladder cancer. A total of 226 patients were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups. Group A received intravesical instillation of ADM (30 mg/30 ml physiological saline) on 19 occasions during a 1-year period after transurethral resection, whereas group B received intravesical instillation of ADM (30 mg/24 ml physiological saline) plus VR (15 mg/6 ml saline) according to the same schedule used for group A. Evaluation was possible in 157 of the 226 registered patients (group A, 76; group B, 81). There was no significant difference in the patients' characteristics between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the overall nonrecurrence rate determined over a 24-month follow-up period. However, group B showed a significantly higher nonrecurrence rate than did group A for tumors measuring less than 1 cm in diameter (P < 0.05) and for histological grade 2 tumors (P < 0.01) in spite of there being no significant difference in the other characteristics of each subgroup of patients. The incidence and severity of side effects were similar in both groups, and VR caused no significant systemic toxicity. Although further follow-up is necessary, these results suggest that intravesical instillation of ADM plus VR is clinically safe and may be more effective than instillation of ADM alone in preventing the postoperative recurrence of superficial bladder cancer (less than 1 cm in diameter, histological grade 2).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00686925 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!