A new Agrobacterium strain isolated from aerial tumors on Ficus benjamina L.

Appl Environ Microbiol

Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, University of Florida, Bradenton 34203.

Published: January 1995

Crown gall tumors, collected from branches of 1-year-old weeping fig (Ficus benjamina L.) trees, yielded both tumorigenic and nonpathogenic agrobacteria. On the basis of classical diagnostic tests, the nonpathogenic strains were identified as Agrobacterium tumefaciens, whereas the tumorigenic strains could not be assigned to any of the known terrestrial Agrobacterium spp. The tumorigenic strains also differed from other members of the genus by producing more acid from mannitol. According to cluster analysis of carbon substrate oxidation (GN Microplate; Biolog, Inc.) and fatty acid content, the tumorigenic fig strains were distinct from strains of A. tumefaciens, Agrobacterium rhizogenes, Agrobacterium vitis, and Agrobacterium rubi. Furthermore, they had unusual opine metabolism, inducing tumors that synthesized nopaline and three recently discovered opines: chrysopine (d-lactone of N-1-deoxy-D-fructosyl-L-glutamine, and N-1-deoxy-D-fructosyl-L-glutamine, and N-1-deoxy-D-fructosyl-5-oxo-L-proline. The nonpathogenic A. tumefaciens strains present in the same tumors were unable to degrade any of the opines tested. The phylogenetic position of the tumorigenic fig strain AF3.10 was inferred from comparing its rrs (i.e., 16S rRNA gene) sequence with those from the type strains of Agrobacterium and Rhizobium species. The analysis showed that strain AF3.10 clustered with A. tumefaciens and A. rubi but not with A. vitis and was far removed from A. rhizogenes. However, the sequence was significantly different from those of A. tumefaciens and A. rubi to suggest that the tumorigenic fig strain may be a new Agrobacterium species that is as different from A. tumefaciens and A. rubi as these two species are from one another.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC167260PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.1.65-73.1995DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tumorigenic fig
12
tumefaciens rubi
12
agrobacterium
8
ficus benjamina
8
tumorigenic strains
8
fig strain
8
strain af310
8
strains
7
tumorigenic
6
tumefaciens
6

Similar Publications

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that certain of the colony formation assay data featured in Fig. 4A and C on p. 2726, tumor images in Fig.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that certain of the Transwell cell invasion assay data shown in Fig. 4B on p. 1635 were strikingly similar to data appearing in different form in other articles written by different authors at different research institutes, which had either already been published or were submitted at around the same time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Retracted] AdipoR1‑mediated miR‑3908 inhibits glioblastoma tumorigenicity through downregulation of STAT2 associated with the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway.

Oncol Rep

March 2024

Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510317, P.R. China.

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that certain of the western blotting data shown in Figs. 3B and 9, and the migration assay data shown in Fig. 6C, were strikingly similar to data that had already appeared in other publications written by different authors at different research institutes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Propranolol (PRO) has been recently discovered to possess anti-tumorigenic effects in cancer patients. So, we aimed to enlighten the in vitro effects of propranolol in A549 lung cancer cells and BEAS2B nontumoral lung cells.

Methods: The gene expression levels of apoptotic proteins; caspases 3, 8, and 9 (CASP3, 8, 9), apoptosis inducing factor (AIF), and DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3) and cell cycle regulatory proteins; WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase (WEE1) and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A) were analyzed with quantitative reverse-transcription PCR to assess the effect of PRO on A549 tumor and BEAS2B nontumoral cells.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Subsequently to the publication of this paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, in Fig. 3 on p. 4973, the data panels shown for the "Osteogenesis" row of data for the GMSC and BMSC experiments appeared to be overlapping, such the data may have been derived from the same original source.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!