Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the newly proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.
Method: Eighty-six acutely ill men and women were prospectively recruited from the Al Ain psychiatric units, UAE. Both versions of ICD-10, the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines and the Diagnostic Criteria for Research (DCR) were used for coding axis I psychiatric diagnosis and its grade of severity; the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule was used to assess disabilities.
Results: Inter-rater reliability of the DAS items ranged from moderate to good, and axis V ratings correctly predicted 84% of the observed classification on axis I.
Conclusion: Axis V is a valid measure of disabilities, but is limited by its modest reliability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.165.5.683 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!