Purpose: Study of the course of possible treatment-related cognitive impairment in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Methods And Materials: Thirty-two consecutive patients with small cell lung cancer underwent successive neurologic and neuropsychologic examinations until 5 months after prophylactic cranial irradiation, and in their pretherapeutic condition were compared to matched controls. Patients with brain metastases were excluded from this study.

Results: Neurologic examination revealed central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities only in the 14 patients with brain metastases. In the remaining patients, neuropsychologic tests showed clear differences between the pretherapeutic performance of patients and that of matched controls (p < 0.001), but no significant deterioration either during or after therapy (0.1 < p < 0.8).

Conclusion: The difference between the pretherapeutic performance of patients and that of matched controls may indicate disease-related cognitive impairment. Within the observation period, no adverse effects of the used therapy were found. Our observations underline the importance of a pretherapeutic assessment in neurotoxicity research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00579-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients small
12
small cell
12
cell lung
12
matched controls
12
patients
8
lung cancer
8
cognitive impairment
8
patients brain
8
brain metastases
8
pretherapeutic performance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!