AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed how burn patients respond to temperature changes and wound care methods, comparing four groups: dressed with variable ambient temperature, undressed with variable temperature, undressed with a fixed temperature of 25°C using heaters, and healthy volunteers.
  • Results showed that for the dressed and undressed groups, feelings of thermal comfort were more closely linked to their metabolic heat production rather than the surrounding temperature.
  • In contrast, patients using electromagnetic heaters had their heat production better correlated with the heater's energy output, highlighting how different treatments require unique environmental conditions for comfort.

Article Abstract

This prospective randomized study was performed to evaluate the metabolic and thermal responsiveness of patients with burns to thermal stress with three protocols of wound care: group I (n = 7) treated with dressings and variable ambient temperature selected for patients subjective comfort; group II (n = 7) treated without dressings and variable ambient temperature for patient comfort; group III (n = 6) treated without dressings and ambient temperature of 25 degrees C, electromagnetic heaters were set to achieve patient subjective comfort; and group IV (n = 6) healthy volunteers. After baseline partitional calorimetry was performed, individual patients were cold-challenged while subjectively comfortable by sequentially lowering either the ambient temperature or the output from the electromagnetic heaters. Heat balance and temperatures were obtained after each perturbation in external energy support. For patients in groups I and II, subjective perception of thermal comfort (warm, neutral, neutral and fed, cool, or cold) was more strongly correlated (p < 0.02) with the changes in the rate of heat production than the actual ambient temperature. For patients treated with electromagnetic heaters, changes in heat production were most strongly correlated with the energy output from the electromagnetic heaters. Even though the environmental conditions required to achieve a particular level of comfort are quite different between treatment groups, the difference in temperature between the patient's surface and ambient is approximately the same for groups I, II, and IV for each subjective state.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199411000-00007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ambient temperature
20
electromagnetic heaters
16
treated dressings
12
comfort group
12
thermal stress
8
patients burns
8
group treated
8
dressings variable
8
variable ambient
8
subjective comfort
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!