The homologous cytosolic and mitochondrial isozymes of aspartate aminotransferase (c- and mAspAT, respectively) seem to follow very different folding pathways after synthesis in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, suggesting that the nascent proteins interact differently with molecular chaperones (Mattingly, J. R., Jr., Iriarte, A., and Martinez-Carrion, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26320-26327). In an attempt to discern the structural basis for this phenomenon, we have begun to study the effect of temperature on the refolding of the guanidine hydrochloride-denatured, purified proteins and their interaction with the groEL/groES molecular chaperone system from Escherichia coli. In the absence of chaperones, temperature has a critical effect on the refolding of the two isozymes, with mAspAT being more susceptible than cAspAT to diminishing refolding yields at increasing temperatures. No refolding is observed for mAspAT at physiological temperatures. The molecular chaperones groEL and groES can extend the temperature range over which the AspAT isozymes successfully refold; however, cAspAT can still refold at higher temperatures than mAspAT. In the absence of groES and MgATP, the two isozymes interact differently with groEL, groEL arrests the refolding of mAspAT throughout the temperature range of 0-45 degrees C. Adding only MgATP releases very little mAspAT from groEL; both groES and MgATP are required for significant refolding of mAspAT in the presence of groEL. On the other hand, the extent to which groEL inhibits the refolding of cAspAT depends upon the temperature of the refolding reaction, only slowing the reaction at 0 degrees C but arresting it completely at 30 degrees C. MgATP alone is sufficient to effect the release of cAspAT from groEL at any temperature examined; inclusion of groES along with MgATP has no effect on the refolding yield but does increase the refolding rate at temperatures greater than 15 degrees C. These results demonstrate that groEL can have significantly different affinities for proteins with highly homologous final tertiary and quarternary structures and suggest that dissimilarities in the primary sequence of the protein substrates may control the structure of the folding intermediates captured by groEL and/or the composition of the surfaces through which the folding proteins interact with groEL.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.3.1138 | DOI Listing |
Structure
June 2024
Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan; Collaborative Research Institute for Innovative Microbiology, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan. Electronic address:
Group I chaperonins are dual heptamer protein complexes that play significant roles in protein homeostasis. The structure and function of the Escherichia coli chaperonin are well characterized. However, the dynamic properties of chaperonins, such as large ATPase-dependent conformational changes by binding of lid-like co-chaperonin GroES, have made structural analyses challenging, and our understanding of these changes during the turnover of chaperonin complex formation is limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
December 2023
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
The bacterial chaperonin GroEL-GroES promotes protein folding through ATP-regulated cycles of substrate protein binding, encapsulation, and release. Here, we have used cryoEM to determine structures of GroEL, GroEL-ADP·BeF, and GroEL-ADP·AlF-GroES all complexed with the model substrate Rubisco. Our structures provide a series of snapshots that show how the conformation and interactions of non-native Rubisco change as it proceeds through the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe chaperonin GroEL is a multisubunit molecular machine that assists in protein folding in the cytosol. Past studies have shown that GroEL undergoes large allosteric conformational changes during its reaction cycle. Here, we report single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer measurements that directly probe the conformational transitions of one subunit within GroEL and its single-ring variant under equilibrium conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSubcell Biochem
December 2022
Biotechnology Innovation Centre, Rhodes University, Makhanda/Grahamstown, South Africa.
Co-chaperonins function together with chaperonins to mediate ATP-dependent protein folding in a variety of cellular compartments. Chaperonins are evolutionarily conserved and form two distinct classes, namely, group I and group II chaperonins. GroEL and its co-chaperonin GroES form part of group I and are the archetypal members of this family of protein folding machines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFASEB J
March 2022
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
GroES/GroEL is the only bacterial chaperone essential under all conditions, making it a potential antibiotic target. Rationally targeting ESKAPE GroES/GroEL as an antibiotic strategy necessitates studying their structure and function. Herein, we outline the structural similarities between Escherichia coli and ESKAPE GroES/GroEL and identify significant differences in intra- and inter-ring cooperativity, required in the refolding cycle of client polypeptides.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!