I am replying to the critical analysis by Jansen and Utzelmann of one of my essays (Blutalkohol 30, 65-95, 1993). I reject their arguments; this underpins, once again, the unsatisfactory prognosis of expert opinion on DWI-offenders. Emphasis should be placed on general preventive measures with rules for behaviour rather than on efforts of assessing the driver's personality, which seems more just only at first sight.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Blutalkohol
November 1994
Untersuchungsstelle für Verkehrstauglichkeit, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar.
I am replying to the critical analysis by Jansen and Utzelmann of one of my essays (Blutalkohol 30, 65-95, 1993). I reject their arguments; this underpins, once again, the unsatisfactory prognosis of expert opinion on DWI-offenders. Emphasis should be placed on general preventive measures with rules for behaviour rather than on efforts of assessing the driver's personality, which seems more just only at first sight.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBlutalkohol
July 1994
Medizinisch-Psychologisches Institut, Hamburg.
The authors discuss the re-orientation regarding the withdrawal of driving licences, aptitude tests, re-training of drivers and therapy for DUI offenders as proposed by Müller in "Blutalkohol" in 1993. The authors note that Müller's analysis refers to an examination practice which is outdated and no longer compatible with the current development of examination and consultation techniques used by officially recognised medico-psychological examination centres in Germany. Methodological misunderstandings and miscalculations in Müller's analysis are pointed out.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!