Background: Despite the widespread view that important clinical and etiologic differences exist between histologic categories of lung cancer, few studies have examined the accuracy of hospital-reported pathologic diagnoses of lung cancer.
Methods: A review of pathologic material and an assessment of survival patterns were conducted in conjunction with a recently completed case-control study of lung cancer among nonsmoking women in Missouri. Using established protocols, tissue slides from tumors of 482 patients were reviewed by 3 pathologists.
Results: Adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type among former smokers and lifetime nonsmokers. The overall agreement rate between the original and review diagnoses was 65.6%. The positive predictive value ranged from 0.33 for bronchioalveolar carcinomas to 0.84 for adenocarcinomas. Agreement rates for small, medium, and large hospitals were 63.1, 66.6, and 66.2%, respectively. Survival rates were highest for bronchioalveolar carcinoma and lowest for small cell carcinoma.
Conclusion: Given the importance of lung cancer to public health and the need to examine risk by histologic type, these data indicate that pathologic review of registry-reported lung cancer cases may be an important component of large scale studies of etiology.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1<29::aid-cncr2820750107>3.0.co;2-q | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!