This report is an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol, popularly known as the TG-21 Protocol. It deals with the calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers and their use in calibrating therapy electron beams. A hierarchy of methods is presented. The first is to calibrate the plane-parallel chamber in a high energy electron beam against a cylindrical chamber which has an Ncylgas value that has been obtained from a NIST traceable 60Co beam calibration. The second method, which is recommended for implementation by the ADCLs is an in-air calibration against a NIST-traceable calibrated cylindrical chamber in a Cobalt-60 beam to obtain a plane-parallel-chamber calibration factor in terms of exposure or air kerma. The third method places the two chambers in a phantom in a Cobalt-60 beam, and leads to an Nppgas value for the plane-parallel chamber. This report also gives Nppgas/NxAion)pp and Nppgas/(NkAion)pp values for five commonly used commercially available plane-parallel chambers: the Capintec PS-033, the Exradin P-11, the Holt, the NACP and the PTW-Markus. The calculation of these Ngas ratios introduces a Kcomp factor which is also calculated for the five parallel plate chambers. The use of the plane-parallel chambers follows the 1983 AAPM protocol for absorbed dose calibrations of electrons, except that new energy-dependent Prepl values are given for the Capintec PS-033 and PTW-Markus chambers consistent with the consensus of reports in the literature. For all the chambers, however, Prepl is unity for 20 MeV electrons. This report does not address the issue of the use of plane-parallel chambers in calibrating photon beams.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597359DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

1983 aapm
12
aapm protocol
12
plane-parallel chambers
12
chambers
9
calibration plane-parallel
8
plane-parallel ionization
8
ionization chambers
8
electron beams
8
extension 1983
8
chambers calibrating
8

Similar Publications

Protocols developed for high-energy dosimetry IAEA (Technical Reports Series No. 277, 1997), AAPM (Med. Phys.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Spencer-Attix water/air restricted mass collision stopping-power ratio is calculated in realistic electron beams in the energy range from 5-50 MeV for a variety of clinical accelerators including the Varian Clinac 2100C, the Philips SL75-20, the Siemens KD2, the AECL Therac 20, and the Scanditronix Medical Microtron 50. The realistic clinical beams are obtained from full Monte Carlo simulations of the clinical linear accelerators using the code BEAM. The stopping-power ratios calculated using clinical beams are compared with those determined according to the AAPM and the IAEA protocols which were calculated by using monoenergetic parallel beams.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This report is an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol, popularly known as the TG-21 Protocol. It deals with the calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers and their use in calibrating therapy electron beams. A hierarchy of methods is presented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.

Med Phys

June 1993

Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

To follow up on the theoretical comparison of the IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of high-energy photons and electrons [Med Phys. 18, 26-35 (1991)], results of a set of dosimetric measurements made with a Farmer type PTW and Capintec ionization chambers in solid water, PMMA, and polystyrene phantoms and exposed to a 4 MV photon beam from a Varian Clinac 4S at Yale, a 10 MV photon beam and 6 and 15 MeV electron beams from a Varian Clinac 1800 at Phelps Radiation Center, University of Connecticut, and a 25 MV photon beam from a Sagittaire at Yale, are presented. Because different methods are used for the determination of electron beam energies, the values of mean electron energy determined by the two protocols are different by up to 8%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!