Fifty per cent of patients with colorectal cancer develop hepatic metastases but only a minority are candidates for potentially curative surgical resection. Hepatic artery chemotherapy (HAC) has been used to treat patients with non-resectable metastases confined to the liver. Although response rates to HAC have been shown to be higher than response rates to systemic chemotherapy, the advantage in terms of survival has been debated. Furthermore, HAC requires surgical catheter placement which adds to the cost and morbidity of treatment. There have now been eight prospective randomized trials of HAC vs intravenous chemotherapy and/or supportive therapy. The present paper analyses the results of these trials with particular reference to survival. Surgical morbidity, treatment-related toxicity and cost are also discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb01764.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!