Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Misgav Ladach General Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.

Published: March 1995

Objective: To evaluate a procedure for cesarean section, consisting of a number of surgical techniques adopted from various sources and further developed.

Methods: The principal elements of the cesarean section procedure followed were: the Joel-Cohen method for opening the abdomen, suturing the uterus in one layer, and non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneal layers. The postoperative recovery of women who underwent this procedure (JCl--group) was compared with that of women who had undergone a Pfannenstiel incision, in which the uterus is sutured in two layers, and both peritoneal layers sutured (Pf2++ group).

Results: The incidence of postoperative febrile morbidity was 7.7% in the JCl--group compared with 19.8% in the Pf2++ group (P < 0.05). Adhesions were found in 6.3% of repeat operations after the JCl--operation compared with 28.8% after the Pf2++ operation (P < 0.05), and there was a non-significant trend toward fewer postoperative analgesics in the JCl--group.

Conclusion: The cesarean section procedure we have devised is not only safe, but has a lower risk of long- and short-term complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(94)02306-jDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cesarean procedure
8
peritoneal layers
8
jcl--group compared
8
evaluation combinations
4
combinations procedures
4
cesarean
4
procedures cesarean
4
cesarean objective
4
objective evaluate
4
procedure
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!