Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Two methods for the determination of sample volumes between 0.2 and 0.6 microliters were compared by preparing standard curves for volumes over this range. The first method used a Periotron and the second the sample mass. A linear model was fitted and 95% confidence limits for volumes estimated by each method were calculated. This showed that use of either the maximum Periotron reading or the sample mass allowed estimation of volumes to within +/- 0.056 microliter and +/- 0.047 microliter respectively. It is proposed that measurement of sample mass provides a simple and accurate method to determine sample volume when analysing drug concentrations at specific sites in the oral cavity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1995.tb01264.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!