Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The oxygen cost of augmented ventilation is increased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, either at rest or during exercise. Thus, if excessive demands are placed on the respiratory muscles during exercise in these patients, we postulate that the total oxygen consumption (VO2) may increase relative to the work rate compared to control subjects. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between VO2 and work rate during exercise in patients with airflow obstruction. A retrospective analysis of data collected over 7 years was conducted. Patients with airflow obstruction (n = 131) were compared and contrasted with those in whom pulmonary function studies (spirometry, lung volumes) were normal (n = 199). Severity of airflow obstruction (ie, mild moderate, severe) was determined, using the 95 percent confidence limits for the ratio of FEV1 to FVC. Incremental exercise studies were performed on a cycle ergometer. Resting VO2 was not significantly different across the groups with airflow obstruction measured either directly or normalized for body weight. The VO2max was significantly reduced in the patients with severe airflow obstruction, compared with the normal group, as well as the patients with mild and moderate airflow obstruction. No differences were noted in the slope of VO2 plotted against work rate in the patients with airflow obstruction (regardless of the severity of the obstruction) and individuals in whom results of pulmonary function tests were normal. In addition, when gender was taken into account, there was essentially no difference in the slopes for either male or female subjects across all groups. Stepwise, linear regression failed to demonstrate any variable or variables that were strongly related to slope. We postulate that the maintenance of a normal slope of VO2 on work rate in patients with airflow obstruction, in whom the oxygen cost and work of breathing is likely increased, may mask a significant reduction in nonrespiratory VO2 (for example, to exercising skeletal muscles).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.106.2.366 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!