The rapidity of technological progress has now made available a device which was only a dream a few years ago, a nearly ideal implantable defibrillator. Despite the persistence of a number of technical and clinical problems, the fourth generation defibrillators are multiprogrammable, with antitachycardia and antibradycardia functions, implantable by the endocavitary approach in most cases thanks to the introduction of biphasic shocks, fitted with constantly improving systems of telemetry, and are progressively smaller in size. The selection of a defibrillator device requires consideration of the patient's needs and the technical characteristics of the defibrillator. Apart from special situations in which the indications of the implantable defibrillator are generally accepted, it is only possible in the absence of results of prospective clinical trials, to use data accumulated on the place of defibrillation compared with other forms of management of severe ventricular arrhythmias. As there is a wide choice of treatment of these ventricular arrhythmias, the role of each must be defined for each individual patient. With regards to the implantable defibrillator, it is essential to take into consideration a number of clinical and paraclinical factors such as the clinical preservation of the arrhythmia, the underlying cardiac disease, left ventricular function and the type of arrhythmia induced by programmed ventricular stimulation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Interv Card Electrophysiol
January 2025
Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Heart Failure & Arrhythmias, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background: Little data exists regarding the optimal antithrombotic strategy during S-ICD implantation to prevent pocket hematomas. This study explores the association between perioperative antithrombotic management and the occurrence of pocket hematoma following S-ICD implantation.
Methods: All patients who underwent de novo S-ICD implantation between February 2009 and January 2023 at Amsterdam UMC were included.
J Cardiol
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common genetic disease with estimated prevalence of 0.2-0.5 %.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCirc Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.G., Nimesh Patel, M.K., M.S.S.).
Cureus
January 2025
Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Military Hospital of Avicenne, Marrakech, MAR.
Infectious myocarditis (IM) and infective endocarditis (IE), sometimes associated with infection of the surrounding mediastinal tissue or embolic complications caused by residual implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead material embedded in the ventricle, present a significant challenge for cardiac surgeons due to the difficulty of precisely locating the old intracardiac pacing lead remnants because of the heart's continuous movement. We present the case of successful two-stage elective sternotomy extraction of two residual defibrillator leads, one trapped in the left innominate vein, easily removed after veinotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and the other embedded intramyocardially in the inferior wall of the right ventricle, successfully removed under CPB after fluoroscopic guidance. The patient was discharged four weeks post-operation without complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Adv
December 2024
Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) remains challenging.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) on SCD in NICM patients.
Methods: Our study cohort included 173 consecutive patients (age 53 ± 14 years, 73% men) scheduled for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) implantation who underwent preimplant cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!