AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare facial profile changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions treated with either extraction or nonextraction methods using standardized facial photographs.
  • Ninety-one patients were assessed with measurements taken from 38 facial landmarks before treatment, after treatment, and two years later.
  • Key findings included that frontal photographs provided more reliable measurements than lateral ones, and there were inconsistencies with certain landmarks; hence, more research is needed to refine methods for assessing facial changes.

Article Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use standardized facial photographs to compare the soft tissue profile changes in persons with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions who were treated with either an extraction or a nonextraction treatment modality. Ninety-one patients (44 extraction and 47 nonextraction) were evaluated with standardized facial photographs, available at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 2 years in retention. The photographs were digitized and displayed on a computer monitor. Thirty-eight landmarks (18 frontal and 20 lateral) were located. From these landmarks, 29 angular and linear dimensions (8 frontal and 21 lateral) were constructed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to compare the absolute dimensions, as well as the incremental changes, between the extraction and nonextraction groups. The present findings indicate that (1) Photographs allow for measurement of structures from a profile, as well as frontal orientations. (2) Measurement of profile changes from facial photographs appear to be fairly reliable but also have significant limitations. (3) Certain landmarks tended to be less reliable than others, e.g., subnasale and gnathion. In general, measurements from frontal photographs were more reliable than those obtained from lateral photographs and linear measurements were more reliable than angular measurements. (4) Changes in head posture within the cephalostat have an impact on vertical facial dimensions measured from frontal photographs. Horizontal dimensions were effected to a lesser degree. (5) Facial structures that lie closer to the camera appeared to be relatively larger than structures located farther from the camera. (6) The overall process of evaluating facial changes from photographs is both technique and operator sensitive. (7) More research specifically testing the photogrammetric method in a clinical setting is needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70107-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facial photographs
12
extraction nonextraction
12
photographs
9
soft tissue
8
standardized facial
8
profile changes
8
frontal lateral
8
frontal photographs
8
changes
6
facial
6

Similar Publications

Background: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I - IDUA gene) is a rare autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder. Clinical symptoms, including visceral overload, are progressive and typically begin postnatally. Descriptions of hepatosplenomegaly associated with lysosomal pathology are uncommon during the prenatal period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Frequently, we perceive emotional information through multiple channels (e.g., face, voice, posture).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Forehead Lift With Cross-Frontal Scalp Anchorage.

Aesthet Surg J

January 2025

Plastic sugeon in private practice, Istanbul, Turkey.

Background: Over the past decade, facial aesthetics has gained popularity, with a notable increase in upper-face lift procedures. Despite the popularity of brows and forehead lifts, the optimal fixation technique remains controversial. Common methods involve suturing of the temporal fascia or using monocortical miniscrews anchored to the frontal bone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Non-surgical alternatives to rhinoplasty are gaining interest but, despite its popularity, research on the long-term psychological impact and post-rhinofiller patients' satisfaction is limited. This study evaluates patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life immediately after and 6 months post-non-surgical rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q questionnaire.

Patients And Methods: This prospective study was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024, involving 83 patients who underwent rhinofiller treatments for esthetic purposes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the effects of presurgical infant orthopaedics using the Modified Grayson technique and Rhinoplasty Appliance System on the maxillary alveolus and nasolabial region in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).

Materials And Methods: This prospective study looked at 26 patients with a mean age of 6.3 ± 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!