Comparing non-nested regression models.

Biometrics

Medical Statistics Unit, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, England.

Published: March 1995

AI Article Synopsis

  • The text describes a method for comparing two non-nested regression models, inspired by Davidson and MacKinnon (1981), using an artificial "supermodel."
  • It explains how the mixing parameter gamma is employed to connect the two models and introduces an approximate supermodel for estimating and testing gamma.
  • The method aligns with traditional F tests for nested models and includes solutions for addressing potential bias in gamma's maximum likelihood estimate, demonstrated through real dataset examples.

Article Abstract

A method for comparing the fits of two non-nested models, based on a suggestion of Davidson and MacKinnon (1981), is developed in the context of linear and nonlinear regression with normal errors. Each model is regarded as a special case of an artificial "supermodel" and is obtained by restricting the value of a mixing parameter gamma to 0 or 1. To enable estimation and hypothesis testing for gamma, an approximate supermodel is used in which the fitted values from the individual models appear in place of the original parametrization. In the case of nested linear models, the proposed test essentially reproduces the standard F test. The calculations required are for the most part straight-forward (basically, linear regression through the origin). The test is extended to cover situations in which serious bias in the maximum likelihood estimate of gamma occurs, simple approximate bounds for the bias being given. Two real datasets are used illustratively throughout.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comparing non-nested
4
non-nested regression
4
models
4
regression models
4
models method
4
method comparing
4
comparing fits
4
fits non-nested
4
non-nested models
4
models based
4

Similar Publications

REDalign: accurate RNA structural alignment using residual encoder-decoder network.

BMC Bioinformatics

November 2024

Biomedical and Robotics Engineering, Incheon National University, 119 Academy-ro, Incheon, 22012, Yeonsu-gu, South Korea.

Background: RNA secondary structural alignment serves as a foundational procedure in identifying conserved structural motifs among RNA sequences, crucially advancing our understanding of novel RNAs via comparative genomic analysis. While various computational strategies for RNA structural alignment exist, they often come with high computational complexity. Specifically, when addressing a set of RNAs with unknown structures, the task of simultaneously predicting their consensus secondary structure and determining the optimal sequence alignment requires an overwhelming computational effort of for each RNA pair.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nearby and non-nested genes in the human genome have more similar genotype tissue expression.

PLoS One

September 2024

Edward S. Rogers, Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Neighboring genes within a shared promoter arrangement (i.e. opposite direction with the neighboring ends as the transcriptional start sites) are expected to have a high similarity in genotype tissue expression due to the potential overlap in the promoter region.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Item response theory (IRT) models are often compared with respect to predictive performance to determine the dimensionality of rating scale data. However, such model comparisons could be biased toward nested-dimensionality IRT models (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Determining how psychological constructs are structured and measured is crucial in developmental science, and structural equation modeling (SEM) is a key method for analyzing these complex relationships.
  • However, estimating the required sample size and statistical power for SEM can be tough, especially when comparing models that aren’t directly related or "non-nested."
  • The authors introduce a Monte Carlo simulation method to help researchers estimate statistical power for choosing between non-nested SEM models, providing a practical guide based on their research on memory development in children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess any correlation between swallowing dysfunction and radiation dose to 5 subregions of the larynx.

Methods And Materials: A cohort of 136 patients with head and neck cancer, treated with either photon or proton radiation therapy, was assessed using an endpoint of patient-reported swallowing scores, evaluated with the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35 survey, within 1 month after treatment. Five subregions of the larynx were contoured, and dosimetric metrics were extracted for each subregion as well as the total larynx.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!