A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comparison of dynamic and isometric force sensors for train-of-four measurement using submaximal stimulation current. | LitMetric

Objective: We studied the accuracy and repeatability of train-of-four (TOF) ratio measurements made from a dynamic piezoelectric sensor that records movement of the thumb in response to ulnar nerve stimulation compared with an isometric mechanomyogram that measures force of contraction of the adductor pollicis.

Methods: The study involved 10 patients whose level of neuromuscular block was held constant with an intravenous (IV) infusion of vecuronium bromide (0.4 to 1.0 micrograms/kg/min) (Organon, West Orange, NJ). The sensors were attached to opposite arms of each patient and simultaneous measurements of TOF ratio were taken at stimulation current levels of 50, 30, and 20 mA.

Results: In comparison to the TOF ratio measured at the maximal stimulation current (50 mA), the TOF ratio from the piezo sensor showed a bias and standard deviation of -0.13 +/- 0.24 when the stimulation current was reduced to 30 mA. At 20 mA, the bias and standard deviation was -0.24 +/- 0.28. The TOF ratio from the mechanomyogram showed a bias and standard deviation of 0.01 +/- 0.07 at 30 mA and 0.0 +/- 0.20 at 20 mA when compared with measurements made when the stimulation current was 50 mA.

Conclusions: Both sensors showed diminished repeatability in TOF measurement with decreasing stimulation current. The data indicate that neither sensor is reliable for general monitoring of neuromuscular block at submaximal current levels. However, the individual patient results showed that some patients could be monitored accurately with both sensors, even at the lowest stimulation current levels.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01627415DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stimulation current
28
tof ratio
20
current levels
12
bias standard
12
standard deviation
12
stimulation
8
current
8
neuromuscular block
8
tof
6
ratio
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!