A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Oral ondansetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis in breast cancer patients. French Ondansetron Study Group. | LitMetric

A multicentre randomised, double-blind parallel group study has been carried out in order to confirm the antiemetic efficacy of orally administered ondansetron. A total of 259 chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients treated with a 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen were randomly assigned to ondansetron (OND) 8 mg tablet or alizapride (ALI) 150 mg intravenous (i.v.) injection, prior to chemotherapy. These treatments were then followed by OND 8 mg tablet or ALI 50 mg tablet, respectively, 8 to 12 h later. Oral treatment was then continued twice a day over 3-5 days. The number of emetic episodes (EE = vomits+retches) and the grade of nausea were recorded; quality of life was assessed using a specific questionnaire. Of the 254 patients analysed for efficacy, complete or major control (success: 0-2 EE) over the 24 h following start of chemotherapy was obtained in 81% of the OND group compared with 47% of the ALI group (P < 0.001). A significant difference in favour of OND was also observed for nausea (P < 0.0001). For on days 2 to 4 emesis, the arm containing OND was superior to that with ALI (worst day analysis): 77% success versus 63% (P < 0.002). The overall control of emesis (from day 1 to day 4) was better with OND (64% patients success in the OND group versus 41% in the ALI group; P < 0.0001). At the end of the study the number of patients wishing to receive the same anti-emetic treatment for their next course was 83% for OND compared with 54% for ALI (P < 0.0001). In terms of quality of life in relation to emesis phenomena, OND was significantly superior to ALI (P = 0.04). Both treatments were well tolerated. In the prevention of the prolonged emesis induced by FAC/FEC-type emetogenic chemotherapy, orally administered OND was superior to ALI, given as an i.v. injection and followed by tablets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(94)00369-gDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ond superior
12
superior ali
12
ond
10
breast cancer
8
cancer patients
8
orally administered
8
ond tablet
8
ali
8
quality life
8
ond group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!