Intravenous regional anesthesia with meperidine.

Anesth Analg

University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinical Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Published: September 1995

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study tested the effects of intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) using meperidine, lidocaine, and saline on 45 healthy volunteers, divided into three groups.
  • The onset of sensory block was faster in the meperidine group compared to saline but slower than lidocaine, with motor block fully developing in meperidine and lidocaine groups but only partially in the saline group.
  • Side effects like dizziness and pain at the injection site were more common in the meperidine group, suggesting it has local anesthetic properties but should be a secondary option for those allergic to traditional local anesthetics.

Article Abstract

Forty-five ASA physical status I volunteers, divided in three groups of 15 each, received intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) of the upper limb with 40 mL meperidine 0.25%, lidocaine 0.5%, or 0.9% sodium chloride (isolated ischemia) by random allocation. Using a double-blind method, the onset and recovery of sensory block was tested at six sites of the forearm and hand. The onset of complete motor block was also assessed. The symptoms after deflation of the tourniquet were recorded. The onset of block, as determined by pin-prick touch, and cold was significantly faster in the meperidine group (P < 0.001) than in the saline group, but also slower (P < 0.001) than in the lidocaine group. After the tourniquet was deflated, recovery occurred in reverse order. A complete motor block was noted in all volunteers from the meperidine and lidocaine groups, but in only 11 cases from the 0.9% sodium chloride group (P < 0.01). In the meperidine group, motor block developed concomitantly or prior to sensory block. There was a significant increase in the incidence of dizziness, nausea, and pain at the injection site in the meperidine group in comparison with the lidocaine group. We conclude that meperidine has local anesthetic action on the peripheral nerve in vivo, but that its single use for IVRA should be a second choice for patients allergic to local anesthetics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199509000-00020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

motor block
12
meperidine group
12
intravenous regional
8
regional anesthesia
8
09% sodium
8
sodium chloride
8
sensory block
8
complete motor
8
lidocaine group
8
meperidine
7

Similar Publications

Aim: Young people with childhood-onset motor disabilities face unique challenges in understanding and managing their condition. This study explored how they learnt about their condition.

Method: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2023-2024 at a Swiss paediatric neurorehabilitation unit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Motor Imagery (MI) electroencephalographic (EEG) signal classification is a pioneer research branch essential for mobility rehabilitation. This paper proposes an end-to-end hybrid deep network "Spatio Temporal Inception Transformer Network (STIT-Net)" model for MI classification. Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) is used to derive the alpha (8-13) Hz and beta (13-30) Hz EEG sub bands which are dominant during motor tasks to enhance the performance of the proposed work.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To investigate the clinical efficacy of using different approach sciatic nerve blocks on the sciatic nerve depth and pain degree in patients with ankle fracture. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 151 patients with ankle fractures who were admitted to the hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. The patients were divided into a control group (n=76) using the greater trochanteric plane approach (GTA) and an observation group (n=75) using the suprapopliteal approach (PA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The objective of the present study is to assess and compare the effectiveness of two different anesthetic agents, namely, 4% articaine and 2% lignocaine, in the extraction of primary molar teeth in children.

Materials And Methods: The study included 25 children requiring bilateral extractions of primary molar, with extraction performed on one side with 4% articaine and the contralateral side extraction with 2% lignocaine at two separate appointments. The anesthetic efficacy was evaluated objectively by assessing pain and the child's behavior at baseline, during injection and during extraction using the sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale objectively, and subjectively using the faces pain rating scale (FPS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The complementary strengths of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have driven extensive research into integrating these two noninvasive modalities to better understand the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive, sensory, and motor functions. However, the precise neural patterns associated with motor functions, especially imagined movements, remain unclear. Specifically, the correlations between electrophysiological responses and hemodynamic activations during executed and imagined movements have not been fully elucidated at a whole-brain level.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!