Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is the best described serum tumor marker for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Almost all clinical studies carried out so far used assays involving polyclonal antibodies against NSE; the majority of the studies analyzed the samples by a RIA NSE kit. We evaluated a new monoclonal kit and compared it to the polyclonal kit. We analyzed 392 serum samples, 265 from patients with SCLC, 88 from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and 39 from children with neuroblastomas. We found a good correlation between the results of the two assays. When correlating NSE in SCLC as measured with the two assays with clinical data, we found the same sensitivity, prognostic impact and value in treatment monitoring. We conclude that the "new" monoclonal assay is a fully acceptable alternative to the "old" polyclonal assay.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!