A dose-defined aerosol infection of pigs was used to study the immunogenic and protective potentials of oral immunization with dead or live Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 9 reference strain CVI 13261 against an aerogenic challenge. Pigs were vaccinated with a single dose of 10(11) CFU of viable (n = 8) or inactivated (n = 8) A. pleuropneumoniae given orally in a gelatin capsule. After 3 weeks, vaccinated pigs and nonvaccinated controls were challenged aerogenically with a dose of 10(8) CFU of A. pleuropneumoniae CVI 13261. The protective efficacy of oral immunization was evaluated by clinical and postmortem examinations. Bronchoalveolar lavage in pigs was performed during the experiment to obtain lavage samples for assessment of local antibodies. Isotype-specific antibody responses in sera and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays based on whole-cell antigen. Oral immunization did not induce clinical side effects. After aerosol challenge, two animals of both vaccinated groups (25% in each case) showed a moderate fever for 2 days, whereas all four pigs (100%) of the nonvaccinated control group developed severe fever. In contrast to the controls, which developed severe pleuropneumonia, the vaccinated pigs had only mild pulmonary lesions. Three weeks after challenge, 13 of 16 vaccinated pigs (81%) were found to be free of pathomorphological changes of the lungs. From two of these pigs immunized with live bacteria we were able to reisolate A. pleuropneumoniae. A significant systemic and pulmonary increase in the concentrations of immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgM, and IgG antibodies reactive with A. pleuropneumoniae was detectable after aerosol challenge in both vaccinated groups. Immunization with viable bacteria was found to induce significantly higher concentrations of each Ig isotype in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids and sera than immunization with inactivated A. pleuropneumoniae. These serological findings were not reflected in the reduction in clinical disease after challenge in comparison to the case for the pigs vaccinated with inactivated bacteria. We concluded that a single oral administration of A. pleuropneumoniae provides partial clinical protection against aerosol challenge infection in the respiratory tract.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC173415 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/iai.63.8.3048-3053.1995 | DOI Listing |
Clin Exp Dent Res
February 2025
School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Background And Objective: Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is the most prevalent oral cancer. Despite considerable advancements in treatment, the 5-year survival rate remains relatively unchanged. Langerhans cells (LCs) play an important role in antitumor immunity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDent Med Probl
January 2025
Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Ergonomics, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland.
Background: Titanium (Ti) biomaterials are widely used in the surgical management of maxillofacial trauma, in oncology and orthognathic surgery. Although Ti is considered highly biocompatible, adverse reactions at the implant site have been reported in numerous clinical studies. However, the influence of Ti mandibular implants on glutathione metabolism, nitrosative stress and systemic inflammation has not been investigated to date.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOral Dis
January 2025
Laboratory of Tissue Regeneration and Immunology and Department of Periodontics, Beijing Key Laboratory of Tooth Regeneration and Function Reconstruction, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Objective: To review the effect of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) of the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) on macrophages during periodontitis development.
Method: Literature pertaining to P.
Allergy
January 2025
Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Background: Among peanut-allergic individuals, there is high variability in the amount of peanut that triggers reactions (i.e., reaction threshold) that is not predictable or well-understood.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAAD Case Rep
February 2025
Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!