This study examined the ability of fluticasone propionate aerosol to reduce oral prednisone requirements in patients with severe asthma. Ninety-six patients dependent on oral prednisone were treated for 16 wk with placebo or fluticasone propionate aerosol (750 or 1,000 micrograms twice daily). Their dosage of oral prednisone was adjusted weekly according to predetermined criteria. A total of 69% and 88% of patients treated with fluticasone propionate 750 and 1,000 micrograms twice daily, respectively, compared with 3% of placebo-treated patients used no prednisone by the end of the study. In the fluticasone propionate groups, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rates at the last evaluable visit/date improved and the number of night awakenings and symptomatic albuterol use declined relative to placebo values (p < 0.05). Patient-rated asthma symptoms improved in the groups receiving fluticasone propionate but not in the placebo group (p < 0.005). Fluticasone propionate aerosol was well-tolerated, and it improved some dimensions of health-related quality of life measured using a standard patient survey. Fluticasone propionate aerosol (750 or 1,000 micrograms twice daily) effectively and safely allowed most asthmatics dependent on oral corticosteroids to reduce or eliminate oral prednisone use while improving pulmonary function and quality of life.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.5.7582278DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluticasone propionate
32
oral prednisone
20
propionate aerosol
16
quality life
12
750 1000
12
1000 micrograms
12
micrograms daily
12
fluticasone
8
dependent oral
8
aerosol 750
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol compared to other asthma treatments at Mexico's National Institute for Respiratory Diseases.
  • Budesonide/formoterol had a lower average cost per patient ($733.36 USD) compared to fluticasone/vilanterol ($767.24 USD), and it showed a significant reduction in exacerbations with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $613.31 USD for better management.
  • Overall, budesonide/formoterol was found to be a very cost-effective treatment option, suggesting it could reduce healthcare costs associated with emergency visits and hospitalizations despite fewer exacerbations per patient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this study we evaluated the effects of flow lamination on aerosol flow dynamics and deposition at the exit point in testing models with spatial barriers (narrowing or curving).We compared ModiFlow (MF) to an idealized Standard Spacer (SS) in their efficiency of delivery of aerosolized medication (fluticasone) across different types of spatial barriers. Fluticasone propionate HFA Inhaler from Prasco Labs 220 µg per actuation was used to deliver 1 spray in each test tube.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with exacerbations which can reduce quality of life and increase mortality. Single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) is recommended for maintenance treatment of COPD among patients experiencing exacerbations despite dual-therapy use. This real-world comparative effectiveness study compared the impact of SITTs, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FORM), on COPD exacerbations and mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The clinical benefits of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) have been demonstrated in clinical trials. There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness and economic outcomes associated with FF/UMEC/VI use in US clinical practice. This real-world study assessed asthma-related exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs among a Medicare Advantage-insured population before and after initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in patients with asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-agonist (ICS/LABA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: UMEC/VI administered via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. However, their efficacy compared to other bronchodilator mono or dual therapies still remains unclear.

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of UMEC/VI dual and UMEC/VI/FF triple therapies versus alternative bronchodilator regimens in COPD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!