There has been recent controversy over the accuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer (RZS). In most instances, there has been a bias towards lower recordings with the RZS. In an attempt to identify the mechanism, we designed a study to test the hypothesis that biased error is due to: (1) the magnitude of the random zero; and (2) the magnitude of the pressure being recorded. A RZS (60 mm Hg zero UK version) was connected via a Y-tube to a standard mercury sphygmomanometer (SMS). The circumference of the cam responsible for the variable reservoir size in the RZS was marked into quarters. Within each 10 mm Hg band from 300 to 60 mm Hg, 12 paired readings were taken randomly: three within each of the four quarters of the cam circumference. The mean SMS value was 148.8 vs. 148.2 mm Hg for the RZS. Although of minimal biological significance this difference was highly significant (t = 6.2; p < 0.0001). Our findings fail to confirm the difference between RZS and SMS previously reported and we did not find any evidence of a relation in the difference between SMS and RZS and either the random zero value or the height of the blood pressure. Our findings suggest that if the RZS does under record BP versus the SMS it may relate to a patient-machine interaction not detectable in our system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A comparison of performance between Teflon and polyurethane safety cannulae at extremes of operating temperatures.
J R Army Med Corps
June 2012
ST-3 Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, St Georges University Hospital, London.
Objectives: In the United Kingdom, approximately eight million peripheral cannulations are performed each year. Intravenous cannulae are made from either polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) or polyurethane. Polyurethane has a lower incidence of thrombophlebitis, however the physical characteristics of polyurethane may make the cannulae difficult to use at higher ambient temperatures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Blood Press Monit
August 2012
Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business and Economics Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Background: The Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer (random-zero) has been used widely in epidemiological observation studies. This study compares blood pressure measurements using the random-zero with measurements using an automated oscillometric device and suggests a correction of the automated oscillometric measurements to enable comparisons of blood pressure levels over time.
Methods: The northern Sweden MONICA population survey 2009 included 1729 participants, 853 men and 876 women, 25-74 years old.
How well do clinic-based blood pressure measurements agree with the mercury standard?
J Gen Intern Med
July 2005
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Background: Obtaining accurate blood pressure (BP) readings is a challenge faced by health professionals. Clinical trials implement strict protocols, whereas clinical practices and studies that assess quality of care utilize a less rigorous protocol for BP measurement.
Objective: To examine agreement between real-time clinic-based assessment of BP and the standard mercury assessment of BP.
What added value does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring brings to the management of post renal transplantation hypertension?
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi
June 2004
Dialysis Center, C. I. Parhon University Hospital, Iaşi.
Objective: To evaluate BP control, white coat hypertension (WCH) and abnormal circadian variability in a significant outpatient sample of renal transplant (RTx) subjects, normotensive at the last regular visit.
Methods: ABPM (Spacelab 90217) was performed every 15 min between 07:00-23:00 h and every 30 min between 23:01-06.59 h.
Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement.
J Hum Hypertens
July 2003
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
The position of both the body and the arm during indirect blood pressure (BP) measurement is often neglected. The aim of the present study was to test the influence of the position of the patient on BP readings: (1) sitting with the arms supported precisely at the right atrium level and (2) supine: (a) with the arms precisely at the right atrium level and (b) with the arms on the examination bed. In a first group of 57 hypertensive patients, two sessions of BP and heart rate (HR) measurements were performed in two positions: sitting and supine with the arms supported precisely at right atrium level in both positions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!