Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Behavioral effects of the selective 2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-hydroxyisoxazol-4- yl)propanoic acid (AMPA) antagonist LY293558, along with its racemate (LY215490) and opposing enantiomer (LY293559) were evaluated in pigeons. When responding was maintained under a multiple fixed ratio 50 responses, fixed interval 5 minute (FRFI) schedule of food presentation, LY215490 completely antagonized the rate suppression induced by AMPA (10 mg/kg) and by the AMPA analog, 2-amino-3-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (ATPA; 40 mg/kg) at 1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg, respectively. In contrast, LY215490, up to 10 mg/kg, was unable to antagonize the rate suppression induced by N-methyl-D-aspartic acid. LY293558, at 0.32 mg/kg, completely blocked the rate suppression produced by AMPA in both components of the multiple schedule. Similarly, LY293558, at 0.64 mg/kg, blocked the rate suppression induced by ATPA in both components. In contrast, the opposing enantiomer, LY293559, up to 10 mg/kg, was without effect on rate suppression produced by AMPA in this model. In additional studies, behavior was maintained under a schedule in which responding was maintained by food presentation in the presence of one key color and in the presence of a second key color, responding was maintained by food and simultaneously suppressed by electric shock ("punished responding"). LY215490 significantly increased punished responding at 10 and 30 mg/kg, whereas unpunished responding was unaffected until 56 mg/kg depressed it. LY293558 significantly increased punished responding at 3 mg/kg without having an effect on unpunished responding. LY293559, on the other hand, was unable to significantly increase punished responding at doses up to 175 mg/kg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!