A review of systemic anticoagulant use in 517 free flap procedures was performed to determine the associated risk of hematoma formation. Patients were divided retrospectively (not randomly) into five groups: no anticoagulation (227 flaps, 5.3 percent hematomas), low-dose heparin bolus of 2000 to 3000 units and postoperative infusion at a rate of 100 to 400 units/hr for 5 to 7 days (192 flaps, 6.7 percent hematomas), intraoperative bolus of 5000 units of heparin without postoperative anticoagulation (46 flaps, 6.5 percent hematomas), high-dose heparin infusion at a rate of 500 to 1200 units/hr (30 flaps, 20 percent hematomas), and dextran 40 infusion at a rate of 25 ml/hr (22 flaps, 9.1 percent hematomas). Intraoperative blood loss was similar for all groups. The flap loss rate was lower in the bolus (1.0 percent) and low-dose (1.0 percent) heparin groups than in the no-anticoagulation group (4.4 percent), but this difference was not statistically significant. The pedicle thrombosis rate also was lower in the bolus (2.2 percent) and low-dose (2.1 percent) heparin groups than in the no-anticoagulation group (6.2 percent). A cause-and-effect relationship between the use of anticoagulants and flap loss or prevention of thrombosis could not be established. We can conclude, however, that the use of low-dose heparin does not increase significantly the risk of hematoma or intraoperative bleeding.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199509000-00017 | DOI Listing |
Background: The adjunctive use of connective tissue grafts (CTGs) in the periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects has been proposed to prevent or limit postoperative gingival recession. However, there is limited evidence regarding the long-term clinical performance of this approach.
Methods: This article presents the five-year follow-up outcomes of a combination therapy using CTG, bone substitutes, and biologics for the treatment of deep intrabony defects associated with gingival recession.
Am J Otolaryngol
December 2024
University of Florida Cancer Center, 2033 Mowry Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Background: Although the literature supports a shorter course of 24 h of prophylaxis after head and neck free flap reconstruction, studies supporting this duration do not differentiate between flap types. There is a paucity of evidence on the optimal duration of prophylaxis for osteocutaneous free flaps with hardware, which may have higher rates of post-operative complications compared to other free flaps. This study aimed to examine the effect of different lengths of antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical site infection (SSI) rates after head and neck reconstruction with osteocutaneous free flaps and hardware.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
October 2024
Department of Surgery, Sana'a University, Sana'a, YEM.
Background In Yemen, traumatic wounds are prevalent, imposing a substantial burden on plastic surgery teams operating within limited-resource settings. Advanced microsurgical reconstruction options are scarce, and expertise in free flap techniques is limited. While local flaps are commonly used for soft tissue reconstruction, there is a need for simpler, effective alternatives with lower complication rates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Plast Surg
January 2025
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Background: Traumatic defects of the lower extremity (LE) require robust soft tissue to cover critical structures and facilitate healing. Free tissue transfer (FTT) is often necessary when local tissue is inadequate. While much of the literature emphasizes free flap viability in successful limb salvage, there is limited understanding regarding the need for additional surgeries or eventual amputation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Surg (Oakv)
November 2024
Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Free tissue transfer is a valuable surgical option for the reconstruction of a myriad of complex lower extremity defects. Currently, there is a paucity of data that examines the risks of complications for each of these unique indications. Patients undergoing lower extremity free flap reconstruction from the ACS-NSQIP 2011-2019 database were stratified into groups based on the etiology and indication for reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!