Because the classification of propafenone and moricizine is not clear, we measured in 20 specifically equipped isolated rabbit hearts QRS duration, QT interval, action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD90), effective refractory period (ERP), conduction time (CT), and rise velocity (Rv) of the monophasic action potentials (AP) during exposure to moricizine and propafenone in comparison with procainamide. Propafenone and procainamide prolonged APD90 and JT. All drugs increased ERP. Propafenone demonstrated marked tonic sodium channel block. Onset of use-dependent kinetics (tau on), defined as change in Rv as fraction per beat at 300 ms cycle length (CL), were 0.047 +/- 0.004/beat for procainamide, 0.050 +/- 0.004/beat for propafenone, and 0.022 +/- 0.003/beat for miricizine. Recovery kinetics, defined as recovery of Rv after cessation of pacing, had a time constant of 5.3 +/- 0.7 s for procainamide, 6.3 +/- 0.8 s for propafenone, and 25.0 +/- 1.3 s for moricizine. Based on these data, moricizine must be classified as a Ic agent, whereas propafenone demonstrates pronounced tonic sodium channel block, in addition to its phasic block, which is similar to class Ia kinetics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005344-199424050-00010 | DOI Listing |
Background: Flecainide and other class-Ic antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are widely used in Andersen-Tawil syndrome type 1 (ATS1) patients. However, class-Ic drugs might be proarrhythmic in some cases. We investigated the molecular mechanisms of class-I AADs proarrhythmia and whether they might increase the risk of death in ATS1 patients with structurally normal hearts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Immunother Cancer
November 2024
Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
Ann Pediatr Cardiol
October 2024
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Background: This study investigated drug-drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation taking both a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and an antiarrhythmic drug.
Methods And Results: Using data from the National Health Insurance database (2012-2018), we identified 78 805 patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs, with 24 142 taking amiodarone, 8631 taking propafenone, 2784 taking dronedarone, 297 taking flecainide, 177 taking sotalol, and 42 772 on DOACs alone. Patients with bradycardia, heart block, heart failure, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valves, or incomplete data were excluded.
Br J Pharmacol
February 2025
Department of Medical Physiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!