In a double-blind, cross-over, 2-day study 32 adult asthmatic patients compared the bronchodilating effect of 0.5 mg terbutaline sulphate aerosol, administered via a 10 cm tube extension attached to the actuator of a pressurized aerosol, with that of 0.2 mg salbutamol sulphate, administered by a conventional pressurized aerosol. New instructions for the inhalation technique were given for the terbutaline aerosol, dividing the actuation of the aerosol and the slow inhalation into two steps. The salbutamol aerosol was to be taken according to the instructions enclosed, i.e. coordinating the actuation of the aerosol and the inhalation. The improvement in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) values was similar for the two treatments. Subjective assessments by the patients showed no differences between the two regimens. As the effect seems to be equal, an aerosol actuator furnished with a tube extension, with no strict demands of synchronizing the actuation of the aerosol and the inhalation, could be a suitable alternative treatment in patients who find self-administration with conventional asthma aerosols difficult.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1980.tb01813.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tube extension
12
actuation aerosol
12
aerosol
11
inhalation technique
8
terbutaline aerosol
8
salbutamol aerosol
8
pressurized aerosol
8
aerosol instructions
8
aerosol inhalation
8
inhalation
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!