AI Article Synopsis

  • Over the past 30 years, public opinion on epilepsy has significantly improved, with 90-95% of adults demonstrating knowledge about the condition.
  • From 1949 to 1979, the percentage of people who would allow their children to play with someone with epilepsy rose from 57% to 89%, while those who viewed epilepsy as insanity increased from 59% to 92%.
  • Improved education, media efforts, and changes in social attitudes have contributed to this shift, with younger and more educated individuals showing the most favorable opinions.

Article Abstract

At 5 years intervals, during the past 30 years, the American Institute of Public Opinion has obtained answers to questions about epilepsy from representative members of the adult population throughout the United States. During this period, knowledge of epilepsy was found in 90 to 95% of the people interviewed. When those familiar with epilepsy were asked if they would object to their children playing with epileptics, the upward trend in those without objections from 1949 to 1979 was 57%, 68%, 67%, 77%, 81%, 84%, 89%. When asked if they thought epilepsy was a form of insanity, the trend in those who did not was: 59%, 68%, 74%, 79%, 81%, 86%, 92%. When asked if epileptics should be employed, the affirmative answers increased with the following variations: 45%, 60%, 75%, 82%, 76%, 81%, 79%. The adverse responses were proportionately reduced. In each of the seven surveys, the most favorable opinion was among the better educated, better employed, younger, and urban members of the population. The states in the eastern, midwestern, and western regions initially showed less prejudice than those in the southern region. Now there is greater uniformity in opinion throughout the nation. Factors that have contributed to the more enlightened opinion include educational efforts by professional and lay societies regarding epilepsy; improved control of seizures; employment by a number of major industries of individuals with a history of attacks; and more reasonable legal regulations concerning immigration, marriage, and the operation of motor vehicles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1980.tb04302.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epilepsy
6
survey public
4
public attitudes
4
attitudes epilepsy
4
epilepsy 1979
4
1979 indication
4
indication trends
4
trends thirty
4
thirty years
4
years years
4

Similar Publications

Background And Objectives: Mitochondrial disorders are multiorgan disorders resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to characterize death-associated factors in an international cohort of deceased individuals with mitochondrial disorders.

Methods: This cross-sectional multicenter observational study used data provided by 26 mitochondrial disease centers from 8 countries from January 2022 to March 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Revised Process for ACNS Guidelines Development.

J Clin Neurophysiol

February 2025

Division of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.

The development of clinical practice guidelines is an evolving field. In response to the need for consistent, evidence-based medical practice, the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society identified the need to update the Society's guideline development process. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guidelines Committee created an action plan with the goal of improving transparency and rigor for future guidelines and bringing existing guidelines to current standards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Central Nervous System Expert Panel is made up of physicians from the disciplines of radiology, emergency medicine, neurosurgery, and neurology, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 24 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 55 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 51 recommendation statements across the 24 scenarios.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!