AI Article Synopsis

  • A study with 150 migraine patients compared the effects of metoclopramide (10 mg and 20 mg) and a placebo on nausea relief during attacks.
  • Nausea was relieved in 71% of the placebo group, while metoclopramide was significantly more effective, helping 86% of patients feel better (p = 0.04).
  • Although metoclopramide didn't reduce pain on its own, it was found to enhance the effectiveness of analgesics and sedatives, nearing statistical significance (p = 0.06).

Article Abstract

One hundred and fifty patients with migraine attacks attending the Copenhagen acute migraine clinic were treated either with metoclopramide 10 mg i.m. metoclopramide 20 mg as suppository or placebo in a double blind trial. All patients simultaneously or 30 minutes later received paracetamol 1 g and diazepam 5 mg orally. The nausea was relieved in 71% of the patients by placebo and bed rest, but metoclopramide was significantly (p = 0.04) more effective and relieved nausea in 86% of the patients. Metoclopramide did not by itself reduce the pain, but enhanced the effect of the analgesic or sedative medication. This effect, however, just failed to be statistically significant (p = 0.06).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC490544PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.43.4.369DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

double blind
8
migraine attacks
8
metoclopramide
5
blind study
4
study metoclopramide
4
metoclopramide treatment
4
treatment migraine
4
attacks fifty
4
patients
4
fifty patients
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To compare fall risk scores of hearing aids embedded with inertial measurement units (IMU-HAs) and powered by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms with scores by trained observers.

Study Design: Prospective, double-blinded, observational study of fall risk scores between trained observers and those of IMU-HAs.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Modern treatment, a healthy diet, and physical activity routines lower the risk factors for metabolic syndrome; however, this condition is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality worldwide. This investigation involved a randomized controlled trial, double-blind, parallel study. Fifty-eight participants with risk factors of metabolic syndrome according to the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups and given probiotics (Lacticaseibacillus paracasei MSMC39-1 and Bifidobacterium animalis TA-1) (n = 31) or a placebo (n = 27).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Adv Skin Wound Care

January 2025

At Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States, Paul T. Gomez, BS, is Summer Research Fellow, Regenerative Sciences Track, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; Saranya P. Wyles, MD, PhD, is Consultant, Department of Dermatology; and Karen L. Andrews, MD, is Director, Vascular Ulcer and Wound Healing Clinic/Gonda Vascular Center, and Consultant, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. At Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, Jennifer R. Arthurs is APRN, Center for Regenerative Medicine; and Alison J. Bruce, MB, ChB, is Consultant, Department of Dermatology.

Background: Chronic nonhealing neuropathic foot ulcers affect approximately 15% to 30% of patients with diabetes mellitus and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although current strategies to address these chronic wounds include a multifactorial approach, clinical outcomes remain poor and warrant improvement. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), derived from autologous or allogeneic blood, is an emerging regenerative product that aims to serve as an adjuvant to standard diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The ORIENT-15 double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) resulted in better clinical outcomes. In this analysis, we sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC from a healthcare system perspective in China.

Methods: A partitioned survival model was constructed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing chemotherapy alone with sintilimab for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Whether prior treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) modifies efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in patients with heart failure (HF) and ejection fraction (EF) >40% is unclear, thus Sac/Val according to ACEi/ARB status at baseline was assessed.

Methods And Results: This was a pre-specified analysis of Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF (PARAGLIDE-HF), a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of Sac/Val versus valsartan, categorizing patients according to baseline ACEi/ARB status. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline through weeks 4 and 8.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!