Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Eleven patients who had unilateral insidious compression of the optic nerve but exhibited no detectable abnormality on plain skull radiographs or non-tomographic views of the optic canal were studied. Paracanalicular meningioma was proved surgically in 10. Complex-motion tomography demonstrated characteristic alterations in the bone forming the optic canal in all cases. These changes consisted of canal enlargement, changes in contour, and an atypical radiographic appearance of the cortical bone, seen as (a) diffuse, spongy, non-homogeneous thickening of the canal margins; (b) multiple tiny saw-tooth-like exostoses projecting into the canal lumen; or (c) short, well-circumscribed areas of smooth bone thickening. Other techniques such as angiography and pneumoencephalography were not as helpful in the diagnosis as complex-motion tomography.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.135.1.7360946 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!