Twenty-five extremity soft-tissue lesions were evaluated by ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and xeroradiography (XR). The lesion was detected by CT in 20 of 25 cases. In five cases, a soft-tissue tumor was not identified by CT due to small lesion size, isodensity, or the inability to distinguish scar tissue from recurrent tumor. Of the three modalities, the vascular bundle was most reliably defined by CT. In 20 of 25 cases, the lesion was detected by XR, but the size was accurately determined in only 13 cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.139.1.7208941DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extremity soft-tissue
8
ultrasound computed
8
computed tomography
8
tomography xeroradiography
8
lesion detected
8
lesion
4
soft-tissue lesion
4
lesion comparative
4
comparative study
4
study ultrasound
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!