Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Thirty-eight patients who had undergone resection of the popliteal vein for deep venous insufficiency 20 years previously were investigated with strain gauge plethysmography and venous pressure measurements. They also replied to a questionnaire. Venous symptoms of some kind were reported by 95% of the patients. The plethysmography and venous pressure measurements showed no restriction of antegrade or retrograde venous flow over the popliteal area. This presumably was attributable to the development of collaterals around the popliteal area, since most of the patients reported a favourable effect during the first postoperative years. The long-term results of popliteal vein resection thus are unsatisfactory.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!