AI Article Synopsis
- The commentary discusses the experimental differences between a negative article by O'Leary, Rosenbaum, and Hughes and positive results from previous studies.
- Key areas of difference include the subjects used in the experiments, the lighting conditions, the measurement techniques, and the overall design of the studies.
- These differences may help explain the contrasting outcomes reported in the negative article compared to original positive findings in the field.
Article Abstract
The following commentary is designed to explain the experimental differences between the foregoing negative article by O'Leary, Rosenbaum, and Hughes and the original articles in this field, whose results were positive. These differences fall under the general categories of subjects, lights, measurements, and design.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00924731 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
o'leary rosenbaum
8
rosenbaum hughes
8
hyperactivity fluorescent
4
fluorescent lighting--fact
4
lighting--fact fancy
4
fancy commentary
4
commentary report
4
report o'leary
4
hughes commentary
4
commentary designed
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!