We believe that our initial experience establishes the fact that ABRs can be routinely and reliably performed in an operating room environment. There was no added risk to the patient, and operative delays were minimal. We did note transient fluctuation in latency values up to 1.5 msec. These changes would revert to baseline levels within five to ten minutes. Changes noted during drilling were probably related to the random noise produced. Case 3 was worrisome in that hearing was lost after maintenance of the ABRs during the surgical procedure. Evidently the vestibule was damaged, and a labyrinthitis caused the hearing loss. We feel that this procedure will be most useful in those situations in which the cochlear nerve and blood vessels are at risk. Such procedures as acoustic tumor removal with attempts to preserve hearing, vestibular nerve sections, and facial nerve problems in the IAC should be routinely monitored. Further experience will, of course, be most helpful in explaining and recognizing these changes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019459988209000119DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

monitoring intraoperative
4
intraoperative auditory
4
auditory brain
4
brain stem
4
stem responses
4
responses initial
4
initial experience
4
experience establishes
4
establishes fact
4
fact abrs
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!