Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The traditional work-up of patients with lower left quadrant peritonitis often includes the eventual use of barium-enema radiography. Diagnosis is usually delayed until adequate patient stabilization allows diagnostic contrast enemas. Delay of accurate diagnosis may, at times, have serious clinical sequelae. The use of barium enema in acute lower left quadrant peritonitis has both theoretic and actual disadvantages. These include extravasation of barium, with resultant barium cellulitis and peritonitis, precipitation of acute obstruction, and delay in evaluation by endoscopy, sonography, computerized tomography, and angiography. Forty recent cases of lower left quadrant peritonitis were evaluated on admission by water-soluble contrast enema. Water-soluble contrast enemas appear to be safe and accurate and avoid the aforementioned disadvantages of barium.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02553980 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!