Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We report on our experience with 11 cases of ureterovaginal fistula primarily treated with percutaneous nephrostomy drainage. In 6 patients the fistula persisted and ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch was performed. In 5 patients the ureterovaginal fistula closed during nephrostomy drainage. In 2 of these 5 cases a distal ureteral stricture developed and was in 1 case successfully treated by ureteral dilation under systemic corticosteroid treatment. In the second case of a ureteral stricture reimplantation was necessary. All 4 patients, that were managed without open surgery had IVP's more than a year after treatment with normal upper tracts. When ureteral reimplantation had to be performed this was an elective procedure with minimal risk and optimal preparation of the patient due to percutaneous nephrostomy drainage.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!