Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Pattern-reversal and flash-evoked potentials (EP) were analyzed in 20 healthy male volunteers (age 40-49 years) to investigate the response variability to monotonously repeated stimulation. The EPs were recorded over O2-T6. Each stimulus train consisted of 256 sweeps. The digitized signals were averaged in four consecutive, non-overlapping blocks, each consisting of 64 sweeps. The subjects were classified according to Q-factor analysis on the basis of five primary personality factors. Two-factorial analyses of variance (repeated measurement) were calculated on the baseline differences with the personality type as grouping factor. The amplitudes of the pattern-reversal EP were increased, those of the flash EP, with one exception, decreased as the stimuli were successively repeated. Differential effects of the personality type on the latencies of the positive components of both VEPs were observed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000118136 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!